The NoSDiet

This Entry:
Date: 2004-02-29
Time: 17:36
Comments: 1



Return To:
Recent Entries

Elsewhere:
Category Selector

Search:
Archive:
 • Jul 2008 (2)
 • Jun 2008 (4)
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry

Others:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal

The NoSDiet

Dan’s blog today has a link to the NoSDiet. A very simple and seemingly good way of eating. It is, of course, little more than your mother told you to do (eat three square meals a day, and don’t be piggy with snacks) but as usual it seems the internet has more brains than big diet book publishers.

My only negative comment about these folk diets is that people have a terrible time understanding that fats in foods have little to do with fatness as in weight gain. So, the NoS guy, predictably, blows off low-fat eating as a fad diet:

[regarding diet systems] It’s funny that these diets masquerade as scientific, because psychologically they rely on the most primitive magicism: magic potion foods that are good for you and can be gorged with impunity, and cursed poison foods that explode with a mouthful (carbohydrates and fat are the two biggies, alternating roles).

What makes you fat is consuming more energy (calories) than you need, and burning not enough of it off, resulting in the storage of the excess as chemical potential energy in fat cells. Since dietary fats are high in calories, that means that reducing dietary fats is a sensible way to lower your calorie intake, and thus a way to avoid becoming corpulent… but this is not the primary benefit of a low-fat diet.

Fats in foods are bad because they are bad for your circulatory system (arteries, veins, heart). Efforts to push low-fat cooking are generally spearheaded by the heart disease people.

In other words, a low-fat diet is important for preventing heart disease. It may, as a side benefit, shave off some calories, but any diet claiming to be beneficial should not be slagging off low-fat eating.

The NoSGuy grudgingly admits that there may be something to eating less fat, and that some fats are required. This is true, and it’s not so complicated to understand. Here is a good reference site that I find myself going back to time and again. They have a very good Healthy Body Calculator (which, incidentally, tells me that I should not miss the start of this year’s running clinics).

return to cmh blog Science & Nature › health     2004-02-29 17:36   ...1
No S Diet

No, no - the no S diet is much different from what your mother told you! Your mother told you eat "sensibly." Because that was totally unquantifiable, there was no metric to follow, and therefore impossible to follow in any sort of objective way.
"No S" provides simple metrics, like "one plate of food at a meal," that easily translate into an answer to "Did I do what I intended to do today?"
at 2008-5-1 09:22 by Michael Gallagher
Add your comment...

your name Help stop spammers: prove you're human! 
    Three plus three is: (learn more
subject/title
comment





All content © 2003-2005 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure