Team Canada: World Police

This Entry:
Date: 2006-09-16
Time: 11:02
Comments: 0



Return To:
Recent Entries

Elsewhere:
Category Selector

Search:
Archive:
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry

Others:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal

Team Canada: World Police

Here’s an article about the stalemate in Afghanistan that I both buy and roughly agree with.

I don’t believe in the Team America: World Police mentality that says western troops can drop into a country, pop off a few assholes and leave rainbows behind. I am concerned that once again western troops, including Canadians this time, believe that a semi-permanent occupation is enough to right wrongs.

What is the objective of this war? Is it to eliminate the Taliban to a man? If so, it is doomed to fail. I am not a student of history, but in this war torn region I believe few, if any, foreign armies have ever prevailed.

More importantly, though, a “might makes right” attitude is not a crowd pleaser with the local population. Without the widespread support of the Afghani people, the project cannot succeed. As long as the Taliban (if that really is a single group… is there an organization chart out there?) have a stronger claim on local government than the central Afghan government, then that support will not occur. Even if the Taliban do threaten and abuse local people, they also pay some of them and most importantly protect their cash crop. The Taliban may not be friends of ordinary Afghans but the situation is far too complicated to say that the Taliban are the enemies of ordinary Afghans.

The only reason foreign troops are in Afghanistan fighting the Taliban and not in Colombia fighting the FARC is that George Bush wanted to kick some people after September 11th. And then there’s that nasty question of religion, which I’m steering away from.

The only reason that we are in Afghanistan fighting the Taliban is because we were sold a reconstruction mission in a country that was growing more stable by the day. I am not happy with the devolution of that mission into random melées and open war.

It looks like the West keeps trying to salvage the old Afghanistan plan through a few more choppers, or another load of tanks and troops. This is not going to work. We need to chuck the old plan, and start a new one.

A new plan needs to consider specifically what a foreign military presence can do on the ground to support the afghan government in its internal struggle against extremists and poppies. We can’t just be their army for them, and certainly not their generals. President Karzai has criticized the “reconstruction team” for its focus on dealing death: “It is not acceptable for us that in all this fighting, Afghans are dying. In the last three to four weeks, 500 to 600 Afghans were killed. [Even] if they are Taleban, they are sons of this land.” This remark was widely panned in the west, but if Karzai sees another way, shouldn’t that be reason enough to question what we’re doing?

It’s about time we chucked the paternalistic crap that we are in Afghanistan saving the day and faced up to the fact that what we’re doing — if well intentioned — isn’t helping.

return to cmh blog Opinion › political     2006-09-16 11:02   ...0
Add your comment...

your name Help stop spammers: prove you're human! 
    Three plus three is: (learn more
subject/title
comment





All content © 2003-2005 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure