Mohammed Cartoons

This Entry:
Date: 2006-02-04
Time: 00:07
Comments: 1



Return To:
Recent Entries

Elsewhere:
Category Selector

Search:
Archive:
 • Oct 2008 (2)
 • Sep 2008 (4)
 • Aug 2008 (2)
 • Jul 2008 (2)
 • Jun 2008 (4)
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry

Others:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal

Mohammed Cartoons

Jyllands-Posten, a newspaper in Denmark, requested and published a series of drawings depicting Mohammed (Muhammed), the prophet of the muslims. (According to the CBC, the call for drawings went out after an author complained that no one would illustrate his book on Mohammed.) The background to this is that muslims believe it is an offence to portray Mohammed, seeing it as one step on the path to idolatry.

Unsurprisingly, muslims around the world are highly offended by a newspaper that would intentionally publish a call for images of Mohammed; this is especially true given the context that the author can’t get his book illustrated specifically because it conflicts with muslim religious belief. Unsurprisingly, muslims are highly affronted when images of their spiritual leader portray him as a suicide bomber and suggest that there are “no more virgins in the kingdom of heaven”.

What newspaper would publish shit like that?

What I find even more unbelievable is that newspapers across Europe are re-printing these cartoons in droves. They support this misguided course of action on the grounds that they need to defend their rights to free speech and a free press. (Perhaps the real reason is that they have flagging circulation? Who knows.) This is totally bizarre because this is not an issue of free speech. It is an issue of respect and decency. Just because you have the right to do something does not make it a good idea.

Publishing drawings of a turban-wearing Mohammed where the turban is actually a bomb with a lit fuse is totally over the top. I am agitated and angry about this, and I am not muslim. I cannot imagine how the muslims feel about all of this.

Europe has a wide swath of racism and intolerance going on, whether it’s against the Indian subcontinent in England, the Africans in France, or whatever. White people seem to feel that we are alone in the world, and can say or do whatever we want about those “animals” who live in the middle east or africa or south america or whatever.

These assholes who are printing this material should smarten up, because there are a lot of people in the world who are being seriously offended. Major international incidents are extremely unpleasant and all, but this kind of inflammatory anti-muslim propaganda (let’s call it what it is) has the potential to inflame millions of people world-wide.

I firmly believe that the world’s increasing fiscal imbalance (to lift a Canadian political metaphor) is a pressure cooker ready to blow off steam. (What do we rich North American’s think the “third world” thinks of us?) That is nothing to what could happen if we really and truly commit to “whities against muslims” as a political agenda. It could happen folks, and if you don’t believe me just start watching coverage.

When major countries like Saudi Arabia start pulling ambassadors, it means that jerks who are reprinting hate material should smarten up. And fast.

return to cmh blog Opinion › normative     2006-02-04 00:07   ...1
Cartoons

ROFLMAO. The fact that you are "agitated and angry" has zero to do with the right of these publications to print what they feel is appropriate. If we all get to ban just one bit of communication, the world will be silent. (By the way, I find your blog offensive to my own religious beliefs, which preclude criticism of cartoon-publishing European journals. I insist that you cease being an "asshole" and "smarten up." Oh... I see: it's only you, and people that you happen to agree with, that are allowed to make such demands. Lucky break that you're infallible, then.)
at 2006-5-3 18:05 by fungo
Add your comment...

your name Help stop spammers: prove you're human! 
    Three plus three is: (learn more
subject/title
comment





All content © 2003-2005 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure