OKCupid Follow-up

This Entry:
Date: 2004-04-04
Time: 20:19
Comments: 9



Return To:
Recent Entries

Elsewhere:
Category Selector

Search:
Archive:
 • Jul 2008 (2)
 • Jun 2008 (4)
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry

Others:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal

OKCupid Follow-up

I know most of you are groaning to find yet another blog entry about OKCupid, but I had a thought about it this aft, and - well - you’re a captive audience, right?

So, it’s a bit late to be making new year’s resolutions (since Q1 2004 has just expired) but in the spirit of self-improvement I offer the following. Select the trait from your profile - one that you feel is accurate for you - that you’d like to work to change (or at least alter). I put the question to you: which would you change, and why?

Now, I’m not so much interested in what overall personality description you’d most like to be, but rather which of Deliberate, Gentle, Love, Master (in my case) you’d like to change a bit.

In my case, I think I’d like to work on Deliberate vs. Random. I think I can get overly caught up in the process of being Deliberate, and it can affect me actually just living my life and being happy about things. If I was less deliberate then I think I might be better at stopping and smelling the roses, and letting the highs and lows of life have an impact on me.

At present (and some of you have talked to me about this) I think I can over-intellectualize my emotions. This can be a good coping strategy for negative emotions, as squelching the emotional part and dealing with the intellectual fallout rationally keeps me on an even keel. On the other hand, if a good emotion comes up I tend to deal with it the same way: squelch the goodness and intellectualize it. That is too much of an even keel. So… I think that if I were a bit more random, and didn’t think things through quite as much, I could just live it up a bit more.

Of course, that would make me the Loverboy, which sounds a bit racy, but maybe I could use a dose of that, even if not the whole kettle of fish, as it were.

Keen to hear your thoughts about this… and about your profile.

return to cmh blog Opinion › cool     2004-04-04 20:19   ...9
I thunk and thunk

I think that when it comes to my profile I need to head in the opposite direction that you do, Colin. I'm a Random Gentle Love Dreamer, and of the four I'm least comfortable with the Random aspect of it. Changing that to Deliberate would make me The Sonnet rather than The Window Shopper, and in reading the profile for The Sonnet there are aspects of myself there, definitely. As Andrew will attest, I have very high standards.

However, I need to be more Deliberate in general, not just in my love life, as it applies to personal growth and well-being. I think I HAVE learned in the last ten years how to be more deliberate in romance, although I suppose I've proven in the last year that I'm still willing to take enormous risks in that area.

But again, personally I think I often find myself dozing among the roses, not just pausing to sniff them. Needs work!
by Keltie
Local Maximum?

Everytime I change a trait or two to ones I like better, I end up getting a slightly more dubious profile. Although, once I ended up being The BattleAxe, which I have to admit I like. Who wouldn't want to be a Delibrate Brutal Love Master? I know that some of us (who shall remain nameless ;) were a bit less than pleased with that designation but I think it kicks @ss!
Admittedly, to get that I had to change three of my four characteristics.

Okay, back to the drawing board...
by Bixby
Sweet and juicy. Hmmm.

Okay, I'd like to change my dreamer status to master status- or as I would like to call it 'doer' status (after the long standing 'Doers and dreamers guide to Nova Scotia'). That would make me 'The Peach'. But I have to tell you, I wouldn't be caught with that hair. Or that necklace.

by Bixby
No change. I like me just the way I am.

I'm the Vapour Trail (Random Brutal Love Master) and I'm quite happy about that. I wouldn't trade the powder blue suit and the cheesy moustache for anything. Oh and I'm quite fond of my Battle Axe mate, too, thank you very much.
by dan
yep

Have to agree with Dan on this one. On balance, I'm happier to be a BattleAxe than I would be being anything else-- I like the idea that I end up edgy rather than sucky. Of course-- the test really only tests who you =think= you are-- so obviously I am interested in talking the bad-ass talk, despite my potentially sucky walking...
by maysie
Sigh... Not the point...

The idea wasn't to pick a new OKCupid profile folks... in many ways the descriptions of them are bad, so it's not surprising that one doesn't want to change. The question is much more about the individual traits themselves. Is being 'random' preferable to being 'deliberate'? Or 'gentle' to 'brutal'? It's great that we like ourselves, and I don't want to suggest that people are in a bad place right now... However, there is always room for change. How about turning the question around for those who are confident they are pegged the way they want to be: If the joys, trials and vicissitudes of life *did* wind up changing you, and three out of the four traits *did* change, then which of the four traits would you want to *make sure* you kept... and why?
by colin
I see you a point and raise you a point

True- but what if changing a trait gave me a completely obnoxious profile! Can't have that! Then everyone could go nyahnyahnyahnyahnyah. So I have to confess that, in my geekish way, I just made a list with all of the 'one away' options, wrote down all the profiles and then picked the one I liked the best. Sneaky, huh?
In terms of the one option I wouldn't change- frankly, I like being random. I think it works for me. It gives me what I might call 'chaotic strength'. Okay- now I'm starting to sound like a role playing character. Bedtime for bonzo.
by Bixby
i can only be one thing

nomatter what changes i make in my profile keeping the basic things same i am always Random, Brutal, Love, Dreamer = the wild rose. However i identify myself more with the peach for even thought opinionated and loyal i am also more oblging and less brutal than potrayed here. I never make anyone bleed unless i am sorely unhappy with him. But the questions dont address both these sides of my personaly, in this test its either black or white, never grey.
at 2007-7-16 18:24 by shaon
I's like to see..

..the global distribution of characteristics. Surely it's not evenly split 1/16th of each trait across the entire world..
at 2007-9-23 21:04 by Matt
Add your comment...

your name Help stop spammers: prove you're human! 
    Three plus three is: (learn more
subject/title
comment





All content © 2003-2005 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure