On the conservatives' view of Parliament

This Entry:
Date: 2005-06-27
Time: 17:51
Comments: 1



Return To:
Recent Entries

Elsewhere:
Category Selector

Search:
Archive:
 • Aug 2008 (2)
 • Jul 2008 (2)
 • Jun 2008 (4)
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry

Others:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal

On the conservatives’ view of Parliament

I am getting very frustrated and irritated by the hurt tone the conservatives have been pushing in the past few weeks.

When they had majorities and teamed with the Bloc to close the house they were the saviours of democracy, defending us from our elected parliament. Now, when the Liberals have the support of the NDP and the Bloc we are seeing ridiculous statements in the media:

Harper: “I think it will lack legitimacy for a lot of Canadians. The truth is, most federalist MPs will oppose this legislation.”

MacKay: “I suspect that the Liberals may invoke closure, which they’ve done as recently as last week. The Liberals have banded together with the Bloc and NDP in the past to shut down Parliament and that strategy may unfold again.”

This kind of strategy insults our intelligence. All political parties expressed positions on same sex marriage in the last election campaign. The liberals, NDP and Bloc all came out in support of the legislation. Only the conservatives opposed it during the election. If we want to find out what Canadians supported at the polls then the matter is simple: Let’s look at the election results, then, and see what the national support for the issue is.

2004 Canadian Election Results
(from the CBC and Parliamentary Web)

Party% of seats% of popular vote
Liberal43.136.7
Bloc17.512.4
NDP6.115.6
Sum66.764.7

Now, when we look at these numbers we will easily see that the three parties who are “banding together to shut down parliament” have not only the traditional mandate to pass legislation (a majority of seats) but have a further mandate from the people: In an election campaign partially fought upon same sex marriage these parties together captured 64.7% of the popular vote!

In fact, if you look at the data, in every province and territory except Alberta the Liberal/NDP/Bloc group captured more of the popular vote than the reform alliance conservatives.

Armed with this information, perhaps we should look at the conservative statement that three parties are ‘banding together to shut down parliament’ in a different light. It seems they are ‘banding together’ to satisfy their election promises and to satisfy the majority of Canadians… federalist and otherwise.

And while I’m ranting, I think that the fact that the liberals and NDP together had a majority in virtually the whole country means that it is quite appropriate for us to have a Liberal-NDP budget. One which, I point out is fully balanced.

It seems like we sent Parliamentarians to Ottawa to accomplish some stuff, and now they are doing it for a change. Good for them. And I wish the Cons would develop a sense of honour… not everyone agrees with Alberta and we don’t need to be slammed for it.

return to cmh blog Opinion › analysis     2005-06-27 17:51   ...1
Word

You're a bit more polite about it than I am.

I think there's a reason why my Da mailed his Conservative Party membership card shortly after the merger. There's no place for Red Tories there anymore.
at 2005-6-27 21:22 by Nurd Grrl
Add your comment...

your name Help stop spammers: prove you're human! 
    Three plus three is: (learn more
subject/title
comment





All content © 2003-2005 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure