O'Brien should step aside temporarily

This Entry:
Date: 2007-12-11
Time: 14:28
Comments: 1



Return To:
Recent Entries

Elsewhere:
Category Selector

Search:
Archive:
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry

Others:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal

O’Brien should step aside temporarily

Sent today to the Ottawa Citizen:

I believe that O’Brien — as a private citizen — is innocent until proven guilty. I also believe, however, that the power and responsibility of the Mayor’s office demands the highest level of integrity, and must be protected from even the suspicion of criminal acts and actors. The recent criminal charges filed against O’Brien raise significant questions of integrity that, until fully resolved, are incompatible with his continuing to hold the office of mayor.

O’Brien has spoken clearly about how the city has laboured under the possibility that he would be charged with a criminal offence. If he chooses to continue on as mayor I fear he will be continuing to hold the city hostage to this issue. In this period of financial challenge, when we are searching for a long-term direction, we look to the mayor to take responsibility and guide our planning. How can he act in a position of oversight when he himself is under suspicion? How can he guide us when he may be found guilty and be stripped of his powers? How can he focus his attention on the city when he must defend himself in court? I believe he cannot do any of these things.

For all of these reasons, I ask Mayor O’Brien to do the right thing. I ask him to take a leave of absence while his criminal proceedings are being dealt with. Step aside and let the city proceed.

return to cmh blog CMH › letters     2007-12-11 14:28   ...1
overwhelming majority

My sentiments entirely. Surprisingly, 47% of those polled disagreed with us. However 47% did agree with us. Ambiguous, but hardly an overwhelming vote of confidence. I wonder what the question actually was....
at 2007-12-17 18:42 by KMH
Add your comment...

your name Help stop spammers: prove you're human! 
    Three plus three is: (learn more
subject/title
comment





All content © 2003-2005 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure