O-Train Subway considered harmful

This Entry:
Date: 2006-12-06
Time: 14:02
Comments: 0



Return To:
Recent Entries

Elsewhere:
Category Selector

Search:
Archive:
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry

Others:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal

O-Train Subway considered harmful

Just a few minutes to dash this off as I’m at work. Sent this out to councillors today.

Dear Councillor,

I am writing to urge you not to support a two-phase light rail plan calling for a downtown tunnel, and instead propose the Friends of the O-Train plan to council.

Although I support a rail technology to reduce congestion downtown, the subway is an ill-conceived and poorly thought out suggestion. There are three key reasons why I feel this is a bad idea:

  1. Spending huge amounts of money to essentially replace the existing O-Train with a different technology on the same run makes no sense. The need for rail transit southward from downtown is already being serviced by the current technology, and it is not at capacity. Extension is possible.
  2. The future subway project will likely never go forward. The massive expense of this solution will never fly in the current political environment against debt. It is unwise to pin the solution to our transit woes upon a “just so” story about how the project could be expanded later.
  3. The right solution has already been proposed. The cheap, efficient, frequent and reliable plan put forward during the election by the Friends of the O-Train would cost much less than a tunnel. It would bring the same benefits in terms of reduction of buses downtown and improved transit.

The subway plan has not been considered by council or citizens and so it is improper to throw it out there and vote on it in a kneejerk manner.

It is not clear why the Friends of the O-Train plan is not being given serious consideration. It isn’t clear what’s wrong with this plan except that it did not originate within the transportation department.

I urge you to table the friends’ plan as an option. It is better thought out and more complete than the vague subway proposal, which can never work.

return to cmh blog CMH › letters     2006-12-06 14:02   ...0
Add your comment...

your name Help stop spammers: prove you're human! 
    Three plus three is: (learn more
subject/title
comment





All content © 2003-2005 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure