Break Open Play

This Entry:
Date: 2003-11-30
Time: 16:03
Comments: 0



Return To:
Recent Entries

Elsewhere:
Category Selector

Search:
Archive:
 • Jul 2008 (2)
 • Jun 2008 (4)
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry

Others:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal

Break Open Play

We went to a National Arts Centre dance production last night with Gav and Emily. Break Open Play (see also here) was commissioned by the NAC’s youth dance committee with a view to hooking more teenagers on dance.

As background, I should say that I’m not a huge dance afficionado, although I find some dance performances quite enjoyable. I’m definitely not a fan of contemporary dance as a voyeuristic experience; I find many modern dance companies fall back on sexual innuendo onstage.

The beginning of Break Open Play got off to a shaky start, but quickly became much more interesting as the company left the obvious “we’re in bed together” material behind.

The dance piece constantly had me re-evaluating what was an active part of the production, and what was passive. The music (excellent, trancy, by the way) had CD clicks and needle pop sounds which gradually came to become rhythmic devices. The stage dressing, consisting of three large floor-to-ceiling sheets of paper mounted as a sort of segmented cyclorama, was soon attacked with scissors and converted to set piece, then later (with the help of some gaff tape) converted to costume. A brilliant prop was an overhead projector that lit dancers dressed in white; overhead markers coloured the dancers in while we watched. Of course, the projector later became incorporated into the performance as more than a static prop, as did the low cart it was on.

All in all, I enjoyed myself, although I thought the pace dragged a bit from time to time. I wonder what the teenagers thought of it… perhaps they thought it needed to be sexxed up?

return to cmh blog Arts & Literature › events     2003-11-30 16:03   ...0
Add your comment...

your name Help stop spammers: prove you're human! 
    Three plus three is: (learn more
subject/title
comment





All content © 2003-2005 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure