cmh blog › ArtsAndLiterature › books
Within:


Search:
Archive:
 • Jul 2008 (2)
 • Jun 2008 (4)
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)
Random Entry


Friends:
 • Jen
 • Keltie
 • On LiveJournal
Steven King on Harry Potter

Always interesting to read one author’s views on another author’s critics.

King Essay (spoilers)

Potter Protagonist

Here’s an interesting link for those of you who have finished the last Harry Potter book. A look at which character might really be considered the protagonist of the story. I think the author makes a good criticism of the story arc, although it doesn’t change my enjoyment of the series.

spoilers beyond

Speech Book

Jen recommended that — at the recent York University Bookstore Blowout — I buy a book called Great Canadian Speeches. The book is very cool. It has a whack of great speeches that were made by Canadians (or at least people in Canada… there is a speech by Mandela).

I have been struck by the extent to which the old speeches in this book are still relevant today. Here’s a representative example. Try and guess what year it was written in as you read through.

When a people, even after expressing their views through all the avenues recognized by constitutional procedure, through people’s assemplies and through their representatives in Parliament after mature deliberation, are constantly exposed to systematic resistance; when their governors, instead of redressing the various ills that they have themselves produced through their bad government, solemnly record and declare their reprehensible determination to undermine and reverse the foundations of civil liberty, it becomes the people’s imperative duty to devote themselves seriously to considering their unfortunate position and the dangers that surround them, and through a well-designed organization to make the necessary arrangements to preserve intact their rights as citizens and their dignity as free human beings.

The wise and immortal writers of the American Declaration of Independance recorded in this document the principles on which the rights of man are solely based, and demanded the advantageous establishment of the institutions and form of government that alone can permanently ensure the prosperity and social well-being of the inhabitants of this continent, whose education and customs, linked to the circumstances of colonization, demand a system of government that depends entirely on the people and is directly responsible to the people.

In common with the various nations of North and South America that have adopted the principles incorporated in this declaration, we regard the doctrines that it contains as sacred and evident: that God did not create any artificial distinctions between man and man; that government is only a simple human institution, formed by those who must be subject to its actions, good or bad, and devoted to the benefit of all those who consent to come or remain under its protection and control; and that therefore the form of government can be changed when it no longer achieves the ends for which it was established; that public authorities and men in power are only the executors of the legitimately expressed wishes of the community, honoured when they possess the confidence of the public and respected when they enjoy public esteem; and that they must be removed from power when they no longer give satisfaction to the people, the only legitimate source of all power.

In conformity with the treaties and capitulations drawn up with our ancestors and guaranteed by the imperial Parliament, the people of this province have for many years unceasingly submitted respectful petitions complaining of the intolerable abuses that poison their days and paralyze their industry. In response to our humble requests, instead of adjustments being granted, aggression has followed aggression until finally it appears that we can no longer cling to the British Empire for our happiness and prosperity, our liberties, and the honour of the people and the Crown of England. The only aim has been to enrich a useless horde of officials who, not content with enjoying salaries that are hugely disproportionate to the duties of their position and to the resources of the country, have banded together in a faction driven purely by private interest to resist all reforms and defend all the iniquities of a government that is the enemy of the rights and liberties of this colony.

So that speech was given by Louis Joseph Papineau on the 23rd of October, 1837. This speech led to a poorly-organized rebellion against the quasi-feudal system that Britain reimposed with the Quebec act of 1774. He himself was a lord in the system. Together with a parallel rebellion in Upper Canada it caused massive political change in the country.

Many of Papineau’s ideas resonate clearly today as multinational “private interest” and “a useless horde of officials” ram the iniquities of neoconservative views and globalisation (etc.) down our throats.

Arts & Literature › books     2005-02-28 19:27   ...1 comment
Cervantes Home Cookin’
Cervantes Cover
I’m (slowly) reading Don Quixote by Cervantes. I’ve been enjoying it although I find that because it is so episodic I have difficulty getting up a real head of steam with it.

Also, what is generally printed as one volume these days is actually two separate works, published ten years apart (in 1605 and 1615). I’ve completely read the first book, which I thoroughly enjoyed, but the second one (like many sequels of today) loses a bit of the fresh edge of the first.

Still, the books are surprisingly readable (although this is a contemporary translation, so this may not be surprising after all) and the story is still quite enjoyable. Widely believed to have established the paradigm of the novel, Don Quixote is still a compelling piece of reading besides.

Here’s a short passage that tickled my fancy:

The first thing that caught Sancho’s eye was a whole steer spitted on a whole elm tree, and in the fire over which it was roasting there was burning a good-size mountain of firewood; six earthenware pots that were aound the blaze had not been made in the common mold, for they were six medium-sized vats, and each could hold a whole slaughterhouse of meat. Whole sheep were swallowed up and hidden in them as if they had been mere pigeons. Innumerable were the hares already skinned and chickens plucked, which hung on the trees ready for burial in the pots; countless too were the birds and game of divers kinds hanging from the branches that the air might cool them. Sancho counted more than sixty wine-skins of more than eight gallons each, and all filled, as it afterward turned out, with generous wines. There were also rows of loaves of the whitest bread, like heaps of wheat piled up on the threshing floors; the cheeses, arranged like open brickwork, formed a wall, and two caldrons full of oil, bigger than dyer’s vats, served to fry the fritters, which, when fried, were drawn out with two mammoth shovels and plunged into another caldron of prepared honey that stood nearby. There were more than fifty cooks male and female, all of them clean, busy, blithe, and buxom. In the swollen belly of the steer were twelve tender little suckling pigs, sewn up within to give the meat a delicious flavor. As to the spices of different kinds, they seemed to have been bought not by the pound but by the quarter, and all lay open to view in a big chest. Indeed, the preparations for the wedding, though in rustic style, were plentiful enough to feed an army. (Signet Classics, 2001 Edition, p. 666).
Mmm… Although its been a long time since 1615, what counts as a good meal has changed very little… a whole wall of cheese… mmm…

To see stories from specific months in the past, select the month of interest from the list at right.

 • Jul 2008 (2)
 • Jun 2008 (4)
 • Apr 2008 (2)
 • Mar 2008 (2)
 • Feb 2008 (2)
 • Jan 2008 (4)
 • Dec 2007 (2)
 • Nov 2007 (4)
 • Oct 2007 (1)
 • Sep 2007 (6)
 • Aug 2007 (4)
 • Jul 2007 (3)
 • Jun 2007 (2)
 • May 2007 (2)
 • Apr 2007 (4)
 • Mar 2007 (2)
 • Feb 2007 (4)
 • Jan 2007 (4)
 • Dec 2006 (4)
 • Nov 2006 (24)
 • Oct 2006 (3)
 • Sep 2006 (1)
 • Aug 2006 (2)
 • Jul 2006 (3)
 • Jun 2006 (6)
 • May 2006 (5)
 • Apr 2006 (5)
 • Mar 2006 (1)
 • Feb 2006 (8)
 • Jan 2006 (11)
 • Dec 2005 (8)
 • Nov 2005 (12)
 • Oct 2005 (10)
 • Sep 2005 (18)
 • Aug 2005 (8)
 • Jul 2005 (10)
 • Jun 2005 (14)
 • May 2005 (8)
 • Apr 2005 (10)
 • Mar 2005 (14)
 • Feb 2005 (12)
 • Jan 2005 (12)
 • Dec 2004 (9)
 • Nov 2004 (18)
 • Oct 2004 (13)
 • Sep 2004 (12)
 • Aug 2004 (16)
 • Jul 2004 (6)
 • Jun 2004 (10)
 • May 2004 (8)
 • Apr 2004 (8)
 • Mar 2004 (27)
 • Feb 2004 (19)
 • Jan 2004 (8)
 • Dec 2003 (10)
 • Nov 2003 (18)




All content © 2003-2007 by Colin Henein. All rights reserved.
People & Places CMH Science & Nature Opinion Arts & Literature Sports & Leisure